<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 389 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395356</link>
    <description>A statutorily mandated deposit of timber with a Government Timber Depot was treated as a supply under GST because the depot functioned as an agent selling the goods by auction on behalf of the principal. The value of that supply had to be determined under the GST valuation rules applicable to principal-to-agent supplies, using open market value or the prescribed alternative methods. The time of supply was linked to removal of the timber for deposit and the corresponding invoice stage. Supervision charges collected by the depot were held taxable as a distinct service, and reverse charge applied where the depot was a government department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 389 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395356</link>
      <description>A statutorily mandated deposit of timber with a Government Timber Depot was treated as a supply under GST because the depot functioned as an agent selling the goods by auction on behalf of the principal. The value of that supply had to be determined under the GST valuation rules applicable to principal-to-agent supplies, using open market value or the prescribed alternative methods. The time of supply was linked to removal of the timber for deposit and the corresponding invoice stage. Supervision charges collected by the depot were held taxable as a distinct service, and reverse charge applied where the depot was a government department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>