<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 375 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395342</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the amount related to the O&amp;amp;M phase should not be included in the percentage of completion method for construction activities. Additionally, VAT and Service Tax should be excluded from the construction contract value for revenue recognition under AS 7.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 12:12:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 375 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395342</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the amount related to the O&amp;amp;M phase should not be included in the percentage of completion method for construction activities. Additionally, VAT and Service Tax should be excluded from the construction contract value for revenue recognition under AS 7.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>