<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 368 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395335</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Revenue&#039;s arguments in a case involving contravention of provisions related to disclosing technical characteristics in export documentation. The Court emphasized the requirement to disclose technical characteristics as per relevant provisions, rejecting the exporter&#039;s argument on declaration requirements. The issues were decided in favor of Revenue, leading to a remand for reconsideration by the Tribunal. The Court also supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation based on alleged suppression of facts by the exporter. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision and highlighting the binding nature of its ruling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 11:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 368 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395335</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Revenue&#039;s arguments in a case involving contravention of provisions related to disclosing technical characteristics in export documentation. The Court emphasized the requirement to disclose technical characteristics as per relevant provisions, rejecting the exporter&#039;s argument on declaration requirements. The issues were decided in favor of Revenue, leading to a remand for reconsideration by the Tribunal. The Court also supported the invocation of the extended period of limitation based on alleged suppression of facts by the exporter. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the High Court&#039;s decision and highlighting the binding nature of its ruling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>