<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1484 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288071</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the reopening of assessments for both parties, citing insufficient grounds for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal deleted the additions of Rs. 26,40,000 and Rs. 16,00,000, respectively, ruling that mere bank deposits do not constitute evidence of undisclosed income without specific and tangible material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1484 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288071</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the reopening of assessments for both parties, citing insufficient grounds for reassessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal deleted the additions of Rs. 26,40,000 and Rs. 16,00,000, respectively, ruling that mere bank deposits do not constitute evidence of undisclosed income without specific and tangible material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288071</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>