<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 674 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288069</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the appeal by the Revenue challenging the cancellation of assessment under section 147 of the IT Act by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court noted that the retrospective amendment in section 148 validated notices issued beyond the prescribed time limit under section 143(2), curing the technical defects identified by the Tribunal. The case was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on merits in accordance with the law, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2020 17:48:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 674 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288069</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the appeal by the Revenue challenging the cancellation of assessment under section 147 of the IT Act by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The Court noted that the retrospective amendment in section 148 validated notices issued beyond the prescribed time limit under section 143(2), curing the technical defects identified by the Tribunal. The case was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on merits in accordance with the law, emphasizing compliance with legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>