<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 357 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395324</link>
    <description>For a life insurer, section 44 read with the First Schedule governs taxable income on the statutory actuarial surplus basis, and profit credited in the shareholders&#039; account remains part of the business computation. The Tribunal also reiterated that actuarial surplus must be worked out under the Insurance Act, 1938 method, and that funds earmarked for future appropriation and policyholder bonuses are ascertained liabilities not includible in taxable surplus. Dividend income was treated as exempt, while the donation claim was rejected as revenue expenditure, with the alternative section 80G claim remanded for verification. The earlier-year loss set-off and recomputation directions were correspondingly restricted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 357 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395324</link>
      <description>For a life insurer, section 44 read with the First Schedule governs taxable income on the statutory actuarial surplus basis, and profit credited in the shareholders&#039; account remains part of the business computation. The Tribunal also reiterated that actuarial surplus must be worked out under the Insurance Act, 1938 method, and that funds earmarked for future appropriation and policyholder bonuses are ascertained liabilities not includible in taxable surplus. Dividend income was treated as exempt, while the donation claim was rejected as revenue expenditure, with the alternative section 80G claim remanded for verification. The earlier-year loss set-off and recomputation directions were correspondingly restricted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>