<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 991 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288065</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT (A) that the property in question is an industrial establishment exempt from Wealth Tax. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed, confirming that the property was not chargeable to Wealth Tax under section 2(ea) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The assessment re-opening was deemed valid despite procedural lapses, and the property was considered industrial land, valued at industrial rates for exemption under section 5(1)(vi) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2020 12:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 991 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288065</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the ld. CIT (A) that the property in question is an industrial establishment exempt from Wealth Tax. The department&#039;s appeals were dismissed, confirming that the property was not chargeable to Wealth Tax under section 2(ea) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The assessment re-opening was deemed valid despite procedural lapses, and the property was considered industrial land, valued at industrial rates for exemption under section 5(1)(vi) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>