https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395314 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application for restoration of a Miscellaneous Order, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with directives. The appellant's claims of financial difficulty and sickness were deemed insufficient to warrant recalling the order. Despite multiple modification applications seeking extensions, the appellant failed to make the directed deposit, leading to the dismissal of the Restoration of Miscellaneous Order application. The Tribunal highlighted the appellant's dilatory tactics and reiterated the necessity of adhering to pre-deposit directions to uphold the legal process's integrity. en-us Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 May 2020 12:06:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395314 The Tribunal dismissed the appellant's application for restoration of a Miscellaneous Order, emphasizing the importance of timely compliance with directives. The appellant's claims of financial difficulty and sickness were deemed insufficient to warrant recalling the order. Despite multiple modification applications seeking extensions, the appellant failed to make the directed deposit, leading to the dismissal of the Restoration of Miscellaneous Order application. The Tribunal highlighted the appellant's dilatory tactics and reiterated the necessity of adhering to pre-deposit directions to uphold the legal process's integrity. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 03 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395314