https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395313 The Tribunal dismissed the Petitioner's claim as they failed to establish the existence of a legally binding agreement, did not adhere to procedural billing requirements, and submitted unsupported invoices. The Tribunal found that the invoices lacked necessary details and were not acknowledged by the Respondent, indicating no work was done. Additionally, the Petitioner did not provide evidence of joint measurements or wage payments verification as required by the Letter of Intent. Allegations of forgery were not adequately refuted, leading to the dismissal of the Petitioner's petition. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395313 The Tribunal dismissed the Petitioner's claim as they failed to establish the existence of a legally binding agreement, did not adhere to procedural billing requirements, and submitted unsupported invoices. The Tribunal found that the invoices lacked necessary details and were not acknowledged by the Respondent, indicating no work was done. Additionally, the Petitioner did not provide evidence of joint measurements or wage payments verification as required by the Letter of Intent. Allegations of forgery were not adequately refuted, leading to the dismissal of the Petitioner's petition. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395313