<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 339 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395306</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order for Assessment Year 2014-15. It held that the shares received were part of a family arrangement and not taxable benefits under Section 2(24)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found the Assessing Officer&#039;s observations beyond jurisdiction, as the transaction was deemed a family arrangement, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and the overturning of the CIT(A) decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 18:37:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 339 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395306</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against the CIT(A) order for Assessment Year 2014-15. It held that the shares received were part of a family arrangement and not taxable benefits under Section 2(24)(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found the Assessing Officer&#039;s observations beyond jurisdiction, as the transaction was deemed a family arrangement, leading to the appeal&#039;s success and the overturning of the CIT(A) decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>