<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 338 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that MAT credit includes surcharge and cess. The calculation of tax liability should first consider total tax payable, including surcharge and cess, before allowing MAT credit. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, aligning with precedent set by various ITAT decisions and the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in CIT vs K. Srinivasan.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 338 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that MAT credit includes surcharge and cess. The calculation of tax liability should first consider total tax payable, including surcharge and cess, before allowing MAT credit. The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee, aligning with precedent set by various ITAT decisions and the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in CIT vs K. Srinivasan.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>