<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 328 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395295</link>
    <description>The court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of fraud by Rockland Hospitals Limited. Despite the Serious Fraud Investigation Office&#039;s claims of the petitioner&#039;s involvement in fraudulent activities, the court found no grounds to withhold bail, noting the petitioner&#039;s compliance with investigations and lack of involvement in bank loan guarantees. The petitioner&#039;s health condition was not considered a sufficient reason for bail. Comparisons with other accused individuals and the application of legal precedents led to the grant of bail upon furnishing a bond and surety. The court&#039;s decision did not impact the trial court proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 11:17:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 328 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395295</link>
      <description>The court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving allegations of fraud by Rockland Hospitals Limited. Despite the Serious Fraud Investigation Office&#039;s claims of the petitioner&#039;s involvement in fraudulent activities, the court found no grounds to withhold bail, noting the petitioner&#039;s compliance with investigations and lack of involvement in bank loan guarantees. The petitioner&#039;s health condition was not considered a sufficient reason for bail. Comparisons with other accused individuals and the application of legal precedents led to the grant of bail upon furnishing a bond and surety. The court&#039;s decision did not impact the trial court proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>