https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395286 The court granted bail to the petitioners in a case involving offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Despite arguments from the Additional Solicitor General regarding the seriousness of the offence, likelihood of evidence tampering, and influencing witnesses, the court found that the petitioners were entitled to bail. The court noted the petitioners' cooperation during the investigation, lack of misuse of seized amounts, and ongoing joint trial. Emphasizing the lack of evidence of tampering or influencing witnesses, the court allowed the bail applications, directing the petitioners to regular bail subject to trial court satisfaction. en-us Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 May 2020 11:04:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395286 The court granted bail to the petitioners in a case involving offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Despite arguments from the Additional Solicitor General regarding the seriousness of the offence, likelihood of evidence tampering, and influencing witnesses, the court found that the petitioners were entitled to bail. The court noted the petitioners' cooperation during the investigation, lack of misuse of seized amounts, and ongoing joint trial. Emphasizing the lack of evidence of tampering or influencing witnesses, the court allowed the bail applications, directing the petitioners to regular bail subject to trial court satisfaction. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395286