<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 319 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395286</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a PMLA prosecution because the usual bail considerations weighed in the petitioners&#039; favour: there was no concrete risk of absconding, the seized documents and material remained with the investigating agency or court, and no real basis was shown for apprehension of witness tampering or influence. The Court also noted that the petitioners had already been granted bail in the scheduled offences, had participated in the proceedings for a substantial period without arrest, and that the seized amount was already secured in fixed deposits. On these facts, the petitioners were found entitled to release on regular bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 11:04:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 319 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395286</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a PMLA prosecution because the usual bail considerations weighed in the petitioners&#039; favour: there was no concrete risk of absconding, the seized documents and material remained with the investigating agency or court, and no real basis was shown for apprehension of witness tampering or influence. The Court also noted that the petitioners had already been granted bail in the scheduled offences, had participated in the proceedings for a substantial period without arrest, and that the seized amount was already secured in fixed deposits. On these facts, the petitioners were found entitled to release on regular bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>