<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 315 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395282</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10 regarding the valuation of urban land for Wealth Tax assessment. However, other appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed valuation process considering factors like location, development potential, and pending patta proceedings. The High Court&#039;s valuation for 2009-10 was upheld, but for subsequent years, the Wealth Tax Officer was directed to reassess the valuation. The lower authorities&#039; orders for assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14 were set aside, confirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s order for 2009-10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2020 10:00:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 315 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395282</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10 regarding the valuation of urban land for Wealth Tax assessment. However, other appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue were partly allowed for statistical purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed valuation process considering factors like location, development potential, and pending patta proceedings. The High Court&#039;s valuation for 2009-10 was upheld, but for subsequent years, the Wealth Tax Officer was directed to reassess the valuation. The lower authorities&#039; orders for assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14 were set aside, confirming the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s order for 2009-10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>