https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395278 The court dismissed the application, refusing to quash the proceedings, directing the lower court to proceed expeditiously with the case. Emphasizing that disputed questions of fact should be resolved during the trial, the court noted that procedural requirements under Section 138 were prima facie met, and the presumption of service of notice stands unless rebutted during the trial. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2020 15:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395278 The court dismissed the application, refusing to quash the proceedings, directing the lower court to proceed expeditiously with the case. Emphasizing that disputed questions of fact should be resolved during the trial, the court noted that procedural requirements under Section 138 were prima facie met, and the presumption of service of notice stands unless rebutted during the trial. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395278