<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 311 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395278</link>
    <description>A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 supported by the cheque, dishonour memo, notice and postal records disclosed a prima facie case of dishonour for insufficiency of funds. Disputes about whether the cheque was issued, whether statutory notice was actually served, and whether the complaint was premature were treated as questions of fact. The HC held that such issues cannot be resolved in proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and must be tested at trial. Service of notice sent by registered post to the correct address could not be rejected at the quashing stage, so the complaint and summoning order were not quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 311 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395278</link>
      <description>A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 supported by the cheque, dishonour memo, notice and postal records disclosed a prima facie case of dishonour for insufficiency of funds. Disputes about whether the cheque was issued, whether statutory notice was actually served, and whether the complaint was premature were treated as questions of fact. The HC held that such issues cannot be resolved in proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and must be tested at trial. Service of notice sent by registered post to the correct address could not be rejected at the quashing stage, so the complaint and summoning order were not quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>