<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (4) TMI 70 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288032</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition filed on behalf of ex-patwaris seeking enforcement of articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, alleging denial of equality and employment opportunities by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The court held that the government had the right to set qualifications for recruitment and exclude those lacking discipline, thus not denying equal opportunity. The petitioners were advised to approach authorities for reconsideration regarding re-entry into government service, with assurances of sympathetic consideration in line with public service demands. The court also upheld the government&#039;s authority to set qualifications for recruitment and exclude individuals with a poor disciplinary record, emphasizing the importance of discipline and efficiency in government service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 16:37:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (4) TMI 70 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288032</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition filed on behalf of ex-patwaris seeking enforcement of articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution, alleging denial of equality and employment opportunities by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The court held that the government had the right to set qualifications for recruitment and exclude those lacking discipline, thus not denying equal opportunity. The petitioners were advised to approach authorities for reconsideration regarding re-entry into government service, with assurances of sympathetic consideration in line with public service demands. The court also upheld the government&#039;s authority to set qualifications for recruitment and exclude individuals with a poor disciplinary record, emphasizing the importance of discipline and efficiency in government service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>