<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288027</link>
    <description>Departmental appeals are not maintainable where the tax effect falls below the monetary limit prescribed by a binding CBDT circular. The circular applies retrospectively to pending matters and, in penalty cases, the tax effect is assessed by reference to the quantum of penalty deleted or reduced. Once the prescribed threshold is not crossed, income-tax authorities cannot pursue the appeal on merits, and the appellate challenge fails at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 13:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288027</link>
      <description>Departmental appeals are not maintainable where the tax effect falls below the monetary limit prescribed by a binding CBDT circular. The circular applies retrospectively to pending matters and, in penalty cases, the tax effect is assessed by reference to the quantum of penalty deleted or reduced. Once the prescribed threshold is not crossed, income-tax authorities cannot pursue the appeal on merits, and the appellate challenge fails at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>