https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288024 The High Court dismissed the appellant's application seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State to make a reference under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court held that the State Government's decision not to refer the case to the Labour Court was based on the appellant not meeting the definition of a "workman" as per the Act. Emphasizing that the Government's decision was administrative, not judicial, the Court upheld the dismissal, stating that it does not intervene unless the decision is based on irrelevant considerations. The appeal was dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2020 13:10:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288024 The High Court dismissed the appellant's application seeking a writ of mandamus to compel the State to make a reference under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act. The Court held that the State Government's decision not to refer the case to the Labour Court was based on the appellant not meeting the definition of a "workman" as per the Act. Emphasizing that the Government's decision was administrative, not judicial, the Court upheld the dismissal, stating that it does not intervene unless the decision is based on irrelevant considerations. The appeal was dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Apr 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288024