https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288023 Where a rent control statute defines "District Magistrate" to include an authorised officer, an Additional District Magistrate vested with the District Magistrate's powers under section 10(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, can validly grant the permission required to institute an ejectment suit. The order transferring the matter to the Additional District Magistrate did not defeat that authority, and the District Magistrate was not treated as a persona designata. The permission was therefore legally effective, the suit was competent, and the ejectment decree remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 16 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2020 13:07:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288023 Where a rent control statute defines "District Magistrate" to include an authorised officer, an Additional District Magistrate vested with the District Magistrate's powers under section 10(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, can validly grant the permission required to institute an ejectment suit. The order transferring the matter to the Additional District Magistrate did not defeat that authority, and the District Magistrate was not treated as a persona designata. The permission was therefore legally effective, the suit was competent, and the ejectment decree remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288023