https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288023 The Supreme Court upheld the competency of the suit under the Eviction Act and the authority of an Additional District Magistrate to grant permission for the suit. The Court rejected the appellants' argument, emphasizing that the definition of "District Magistrate" under the Act includes officers authorized by the District Magistrate. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to decree the suit for ejectment and award damages to the respondent. en-us Mon, 16 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2020 13:07:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288023 The Supreme Court upheld the competency of the suit under the Eviction Act and the authority of an Additional District Magistrate to grant permission for the suit. The Court rejected the appellants' argument, emphasizing that the definition of "District Magistrate" under the Act includes officers authorized by the District Magistrate. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision to decree the suit for ejectment and award damages to the respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Jan 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288023