https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288019 A prior remand for decision on merits, obtained by consent, could not be defeated by allowing withdrawal of the revision and original petition. The Court noted that the dispute concerned the character of trust property, the existence of a specific endowment, and the statutory consequences for any proposed sale, all of which required merits-based adjudication. It further indicated that the revisional court could examine the jurisdictional fact and, if necessary, admit or direct further evidence to resolve the controversy. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration of the substantive trust and endowment issues. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2020 12:49:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288019 A prior remand for decision on merits, obtained by consent, could not be defeated by allowing withdrawal of the revision and original petition. The Court noted that the dispute concerned the character of trust property, the existence of a specific endowment, and the statutory consequences for any proposed sale, all of which required merits-based adjudication. It further indicated that the revisional court could examine the jurisdictional fact and, if necessary, admit or direct further evidence to resolve the controversy. The matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration of the substantive trust and endowment issues. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288019