<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 707 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288019</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, remitting the matter to the High Court for a decision on merits and in accordance with law. The High Court must consider the nature of the property, the necessity of the Commissioner&#039;s sanction under the Endowment Act, 1959, and the jurisdictional aspects. The Supreme Court&#039;s directive ensures a comprehensive adjudication, safeguarding the interests of the trust and compliance with legal requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 12:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612901" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 707 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288019</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, remitting the matter to the High Court for a decision on merits and in accordance with law. The High Court must consider the nature of the property, the necessity of the Commissioner&#039;s sanction under the Endowment Act, 1959, and the jurisdictional aspects. The Supreme Court&#039;s directive ensures a comprehensive adjudication, safeguarding the interests of the trust and compliance with legal requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>