https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288017 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 6(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, finding that the delegation of power to the Provincial Government was within permissible limits. The Court also ruled that notifications issued under this section were valid and not in violation of Article 31 of the Constitution. It was clarified that the power to issue notifications under Section 6(2) could be exercised as needed and was not exhausted after the first notification. The Court rejected challenges to the interpretation of "any particular area" in the Act. Justice K. Subba Rao dissented on the vires of Section 6(2), deeming it void, but the majority dismissed the appeals. en-us Thu, 25 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2020 12:00:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288017 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 6(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, finding that the delegation of power to the Provincial Government was within permissible limits. The Court also ruled that notifications issued under this section were valid and not in violation of Article 31 of the Constitution. It was clarified that the power to issue notifications under Section 6(2) could be exercised as needed and was not exhausted after the first notification. The Court rejected challenges to the interpretation of "any particular area" in the Act. Justice K. Subba Rao dissented on the vires of Section 6(2), deeming it void, but the majority dismissed the appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288017