<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1926 (8) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288014</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that Abkari-officers, akin to police officers under the Bombay Abkari Act, are deemed &quot;Police officers&quot; under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act. Therefore, confessions made to such officers during investigations are inadmissible. The judgment aligns with the expansive interpretation of &quot;Police officer&quot; in previous cases, safeguarding accused individuals from potential abuses of power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1926 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 10:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1926 (8) TMI 3 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288014</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that Abkari-officers, akin to police officers under the Bombay Abkari Act, are deemed &quot;Police officers&quot; under Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act. Therefore, confessions made to such officers during investigations are inadmissible. The judgment aligns with the expansive interpretation of &quot;Police officer&quot; in previous cases, safeguarding accused individuals from potential abuses of power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1926 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>