https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288012 The court held that an Inspector of Excise is not considered a "Police Officer" within the meaning of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. Confessions made to an Inspector of Excise were deemed admissible in evidence, as the Excise Officer was not classified as a police officer despite having certain powers resembling those of a police officer. The court rejected the argument that an Excise Inspector falls under the definition of a "police officer" and upheld the admissibility of confessions made to such officers. en-us Fri, 02 Sep 1932 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 May 2020 10:30:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288012 The court held that an Inspector of Excise is not considered a "Police Officer" within the meaning of Section 25 of the Evidence Act. Confessions made to an Inspector of Excise were deemed admissible in evidence, as the Excise Officer was not classified as a police officer despite having certain powers resembling those of a police officer. The court rejected the argument that an Excise Inspector falls under the definition of a "police officer" and upheld the admissibility of confessions made to such officers. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Sep 1932 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288012