<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1190 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288011</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the CUP Method and remand the case for fresh consideration based on the TNMM Method was found to be legally sound and justified. The Tribunal emphasized that the final fact-finding authority is entitled to determine the most appropriate method based on the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2020 02:08:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1190 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288011</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal&#039;s decision to reject the CUP Method and remand the case for fresh consideration based on the TNMM Method was found to be legally sound and justified. The Tribunal emphasized that the final fact-finding authority is entitled to determine the most appropriate method based on the specific circumstances of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>