<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 20 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22287</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the assessment of a Hindu undivided family engaged in the rice milling business. The Court emphasized the importance of a reasoned basis for best judgment assessments and criticized arbitrary decisions. It found the income-tax authorities&#039; presumption regarding the quality of rice supplied under levy orders to be unwarranted and lacking acceptable reasoning. The Court held that the Tribunal was unjustified in upholding the addition in the trading account, ruling against the sustained addition of Rs. 30,146 without imposing any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 20 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22287</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the assessment of a Hindu undivided family engaged in the rice milling business. The Court emphasized the importance of a reasoned basis for best judgment assessments and criticized arbitrary decisions. It found the income-tax authorities&#039; presumption regarding the quality of rice supplied under levy orders to be unwarranted and lacking acceptable reasoning. The Court held that the Tribunal was unjustified in upholding the addition in the trading account, ruling against the sustained addition of Rs. 30,146 without imposing any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>