<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (10) TMI 14 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287998</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, declaring the revocation of the appellant&#039;s license under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 as illegal, inoperative, and void. The appellant was permitted to retain and operate under its license as if the revocation notice had not been issued. The court highlighted the necessity for the Provincial Government to act judicially and afford the licensee an opportunity to be heard before revoking a license to ensure procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 17:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612846" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (10) TMI 14 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287998</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, declaring the revocation of the appellant&#039;s license under the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 as illegal, inoperative, and void. The appellant was permitted to retain and operate under its license as if the revocation notice had not been issued. The court highlighted the necessity for the Provincial Government to act judicially and afford the licensee an opportunity to be heard before revoking a license to ensure procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>