https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287994 The court declared Clause (b) of Section 8(3) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, including the words "whichever is less," to be unconstitutional. The provision for compensation based on an arbitrary date was deemed void, ensuring future assessments would be made without reference to this clause. The petitioner was awarded costs of Rs. 500. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 May 2020 16:06:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287994 The court declared Clause (b) of Section 8(3) of the Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, including the words "whichever is less," to be unconstitutional. The provision for compensation based on an arbitrary date was deemed void, ensuring future assessments would be made without reference to this clause. The petitioner was awarded costs of Rs. 500. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287994