<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (9) TMI 101 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287991</link>
    <description>The court held that Mazagaon Dock Limited, despite being wholly owned by the Central Government, operates independently and is not an industry carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government. Therefore, the State-appointed Conciliation Officer has jurisdiction over the industrial disputes concerning Mazagaon Dock Limited. The petitioners&#039; contentions were dismissed, and the petition was rejected with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 14:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (9) TMI 101 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287991</link>
      <description>The court held that Mazagaon Dock Limited, despite being wholly owned by the Central Government, operates independently and is not an industry carried on by or under the authority of the Central Government. Therefore, the State-appointed Conciliation Officer has jurisdiction over the industrial disputes concerning Mazagaon Dock Limited. The petitioners&#039; contentions were dismissed, and the petition was rejected with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>