<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 284 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395251</link>
    <description>Carbonated fruit juice beverages were treated as classifiable under Heading 2202 10 20 / 2202 10 90 because the products were found to be principally carbonated, water-based beverages marketed with fruit juice, and consistent with the FSSAI description of carbonated beverages with fruit juice. The authority distinguished the separate entry for fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks under 2202 99 20, noting that the fruit content was below the level relied on for that classification and that the cited larger bench ruling was not applicable. The advance ruling on classification was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 284 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TAMILNADU</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395251</link>
      <description>Carbonated fruit juice beverages were treated as classifiable under Heading 2202 10 20 / 2202 10 90 because the products were found to be principally carbonated, water-based beverages marketed with fruit juice, and consistent with the FSSAI description of carbonated beverages with fruit juice. The authority distinguished the separate entry for fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks under 2202 99 20, noting that the fruit content was below the level relied on for that classification and that the cited larger bench ruling was not applicable. The advance ruling on classification was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>