https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395244 The tribunal clarified that the orders dated 15-05-2019 and 13-08-2019 did not restrict the respondent from conducting investigations or requesting documents, as long as fresh references were registered in compliance with the law. It affirmed the authority of a Single Member Bench to interpret orders passed by a Division Bench, citing the doctrine of necessity. The case was scheduled for a hearing on 30th July 2020. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 May 2020 11:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395244 The tribunal clarified that the orders dated 15-05-2019 and 13-08-2019 did not restrict the respondent from conducting investigations or requesting documents, as long as fresh references were registered in compliance with the law. It affirmed the authority of a Single Member Bench to interpret orders passed by a Division Bench, citing the doctrine of necessity. The case was scheduled for a hearing on 30th July 2020. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395244