https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287984 Section 10(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act permits prohibition of a strike or lockout only when it is connected with a dispute already referred for adjudication. An order compelling a mill to continue operations could not be sustained where the stoppage was treated as a closure driven by losses rather than a strike or lockout ancillary to another dispute. The commentary also notes that an administrative order made without statutory authority may be challenged under Article 226, and that corporate bodies may invoke fundamental rights where the right claimed permits. The industrial reference itself was not invalidated and was left for adjudication on merits. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 May 2020 10:09:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287984 Section 10(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act permits prohibition of a strike or lockout only when it is connected with a dispute already referred for adjudication. An order compelling a mill to continue operations could not be sustained where the stoppage was treated as a closure driven by losses rather than a strike or lockout ancillary to another dispute. The commentary also notes that an administrative order made without statutory authority may be challenged under Article 226, and that corporate bodies may invoke fundamental rights where the right claimed permits. The industrial reference itself was not invalidated and was left for adjudication on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Feb 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287984