<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 273 - THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI-II BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395240</link>
    <description>The petition filed under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was admitted, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and declaring a moratorium. The operational creditor alleged a default in payment by the corporate debtor, arising from a construction contract. The corporate debtor&#039;s objections and disputes were not substantiated with evidence, leading to the court finding in favor of the operational creditor. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed, and immediate expenses were directed to be deposited. The moratorium was enforced, and relevant parties were notified for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 10:08:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 273 - THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — NEW DELHI-II BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395240</link>
      <description>The petition filed under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was admitted, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and declaring a moratorium. The operational creditor alleged a default in payment by the corporate debtor, arising from a construction contract. The corporate debtor&#039;s objections and disputes were not substantiated with evidence, leading to the court finding in favor of the operational creditor. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed, and immediate expenses were directed to be deposited. The moratorium was enforced, and relevant parties were notified for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>