<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (12) TMI 101 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287967</link>
    <description>Section 38(3)(b)(iii) of the Banking Companies Act, 1949 is discussed as a depositor-protection measure allowing the Reserve Bank to seek winding up where, in its opinion, continuance of a banking company would prejudice depositors. The provision is analysed as involving subjective satisfaction by an expert authority, but with adequate statutory guidance and a rational classification between urgent cases requiring winding up and cases warranting lesser regulatory action. The text also notes that a company incorporated before the Constitution may invoke Article 19 if it satisfies the constitutional criteria for citizenship at commencement, and that corporate bodies can enjoy the rights under Articles 19(1)(f) and (g).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 17:56:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (12) TMI 101 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287967</link>
      <description>Section 38(3)(b)(iii) of the Banking Companies Act, 1949 is discussed as a depositor-protection measure allowing the Reserve Bank to seek winding up where, in its opinion, continuance of a banking company would prejudice depositors. The provision is analysed as involving subjective satisfaction by an expert authority, but with adequate statutory guidance and a rational classification between urgent cases requiring winding up and cases warranting lesser regulatory action. The text also notes that a company incorporated before the Constitution may invoke Article 19 if it satisfies the constitutional criteria for citizenship at commencement, and that corporate bodies can enjoy the rights under Articles 19(1)(f) and (g).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>