https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287964 The Court held that it had jurisdiction to issue the writs claimed under Article 226, upheld the validity of Section 52A of the Indian Insurance Act, 1938, determining it did not violate constitutional rights. It found the Controller's functions under Section 52A to be administrative, not judicial or quasi-judicial, and denied the issuance of writs of 'certiorari', 'mandamus', and 'prohibition'. The Court dismissed the petitions and ordered costs to be paid. en-us Wed, 20 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2020 17:22:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287964 The Court held that it had jurisdiction to issue the writs claimed under Article 226, upheld the validity of Section 52A of the Indian Insurance Act, 1938, determining it did not violate constitutional rights. It found the Controller's functions under Section 52A to be administrative, not judicial or quasi-judicial, and denied the issuance of writs of 'certiorari', 'mandamus', and 'prohibition'. The Court dismissed the petitions and ordered costs to be paid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jun 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287964