https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287965 The Supreme Court held that the second respondent lacked jurisdiction to entertain the first respondent's application under Section 17 of the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955. The Court dismissed the petition filed under Article 32 challenging the vires of Section 17, stating that once Section 17 was deemed valid, the petition's competence under Article 32 was compromised as it did not involve fundamental rights. Consequently, the petition was dismissed on technical grounds, with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2020 17:22:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287965 The Supreme Court held that the second respondent lacked jurisdiction to entertain the first respondent's application under Section 17 of the Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955. The Court dismissed the petition filed under Article 32 challenging the vires of Section 17, stating that once Section 17 was deemed valid, the petition's competence under Article 32 was compromised as it did not involve fundamental rights. Consequently, the petition was dismissed on technical grounds, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 19 Mar 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287965