<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 673 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, EASTERN REGION BENCH, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287963</link>
    <description>The petition under section 111A of the Companies Act, 1956 was granted, directing the respondent company to register the 100 shares in favor of the petitioner. The court emphasized the lack of response from the transferor and the established purchase of the shares by the petitioner as grounds for the decision. A two-month notice period was provided for any objections from the transferor, failing which the company was instructed to register the shares in the petitioner&#039;s name and release all benefits. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper documentation and the company&#039;s duty to register shares in the absence of objections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 14:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 673 - COMPANY LAW BOARD, EASTERN REGION BENCH, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287963</link>
      <description>The petition under section 111A of the Companies Act, 1956 was granted, directing the respondent company to register the 100 shares in favor of the petitioner. The court emphasized the lack of response from the transferor and the established purchase of the shares by the petitioner as grounds for the decision. A two-month notice period was provided for any objections from the transferor, failing which the company was instructed to register the shares in the petitioner&#039;s name and release all benefits. The judgment highlighted the importance of proper documentation and the company&#039;s duty to register shares in the absence of objections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>