<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 246 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395213</link>
    <description>The court dismissed both appeals, affirming the learned Single Judge&#039;s decisions. The Deed of transfer of leasehold rights dated 30.01.1997 was not validated, and the application for leave to institute a suit against the company under liquidation was denied. The court emphasized the importance of bonafide transactions and adherence to the law of limitation in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 11:35:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 246 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395213</link>
      <description>The court dismissed both appeals, affirming the learned Single Judge&#039;s decisions. The Deed of transfer of leasehold rights dated 30.01.1997 was not validated, and the application for leave to institute a suit against the company under liquidation was denied. The court emphasized the importance of bonafide transactions and adherence to the law of limitation in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>