https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395212 The appeal was dismissed as the appellants failed to prove their ownership of the flats, did not produce original title documents, and did not step into the witness box. The consent decrees from the Bombay High Court were found to be invalid, and the SFIO report supported the conclusion that the transactions were unauthorized. The pending application was disposed of as infructuous. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2020 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395212 The appeal was dismissed as the appellants failed to prove their ownership of the flats, did not produce original title documents, and did not step into the witness box. The consent decrees from the Bombay High Court were found to be invalid, and the SFIO report supported the conclusion that the transactions were unauthorized. The pending application was disposed of as infructuous. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395212