https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395212 A claimant seeking protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act must prove title and the genuineness of the transaction through reliable evidence; mere photocopies of unregistered documents, unsupported by original records, proof of consideration, or testimony from a witness with personal knowledge, were insufficient, so protection was denied. Consent decrees obtained after appointment of the Official Liquidator could not bind the company in liquidation where the assets were already in the liquidator's custody and no leave of the company court had been obtained; the decrees were treated as collusive and invalid against the liquidation estate. en-us Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2020 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395212 A claimant seeking protection under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act must prove title and the genuineness of the transaction through reliable evidence; mere photocopies of unregistered documents, unsupported by original records, proof of consideration, or testimony from a witness with personal knowledge, were insufficient, so protection was denied. Consent decrees obtained after appointment of the Official Liquidator could not bind the company in liquidation where the assets were already in the liquidator's custody and no leave of the company court had been obtained; the decrees were treated as collusive and invalid against the liquidation estate. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395212