https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287960 A duly authorised power of attorney holder is competent to depose in a suit for declaration and possession; Order III CPC does not bar such evidence, though its weight depends on the witness's personal knowledge. Documentary evidence, including a registered sale deed, may be proved through competent witnesses, and the plaintiff's own testimony is not always indispensable. In second appeal, concurrent findings on title, adverse possession, permissive possession, and property identity will not be disturbed unless a substantial question of law, perversity, or legal error is shown. As the objections were factual and no substantial question of law arose, the second appeal failed and the decree for the plaintiff was affirmed. en-us Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 May 2020 10:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287960 A duly authorised power of attorney holder is competent to depose in a suit for declaration and possession; Order III CPC does not bar such evidence, though its weight depends on the witness's personal knowledge. Documentary evidence, including a registered sale deed, may be proved through competent witnesses, and the plaintiff's own testimony is not always indispensable. In second appeal, concurrent findings on title, adverse possession, permissive possession, and property identity will not be disturbed unless a substantial question of law, perversity, or legal error is shown. As the objections were factual and no substantial question of law arose, the second appeal failed and the decree for the plaintiff was affirmed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287960