<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 242 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395209</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the arbitral award, deeming the Arbitral Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of Clause 23 as unreasonable and unsupported by the contract terms. The Court emphasized the need to adhere to the explicit contract terms and highlighted the limited scope of judicial review in arbitral cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 08:58:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 242 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395209</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to set aside the arbitral award, deeming the Arbitral Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of Clause 23 as unreasonable and unsupported by the contract terms. The Court emphasized the need to adhere to the explicit contract terms and highlighted the limited scope of judicial review in arbitral cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>