<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1768 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287949</link>
    <description>The bank petitioner initiated the corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor for defaulting on facilities totaling Rs. 14,69,00,000. The petitioner provided evidence of default, including security documents and a statement of account, leading to the admission of the petition by the Adjudicating Authority. Despite the debtor&#039;s proposal for settlement and restructuring, the petitioner rejected it, resulting in the appointment of an interim resolution professional and the imposition of a moratorium on legal actions against the debtor. The order ensured the proper conduct of the insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 08:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1768 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287949</link>
      <description>The bank petitioner initiated the corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor for defaulting on facilities totaling Rs. 14,69,00,000. The petitioner provided evidence of default, including security documents and a statement of account, leading to the admission of the petition by the Adjudicating Authority. Despite the debtor&#039;s proposal for settlement and restructuring, the petitioner rejected it, resulting in the appointment of an interim resolution professional and the imposition of a moratorium on legal actions against the debtor. The order ensured the proper conduct of the insolvency resolution process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>