<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1957 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code petition, emphasizing the importance of honoring the arbitration process due to the existence of pending arbitration proceedings. The petitioner&#039;s claim for non-payment of services rendered was deemed premature as the respondent had initiated arbitration proceedings, which were progressing with the appointment of a sole arbitrator. The Tribunal highlighted the need to respect the arbitration clause in the agreement and advised the petitioner to address any non-compliance by the respondent with the arbitral award through subsequent proceedings if required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2020 08:51:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1957 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL — CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code petition, emphasizing the importance of honoring the arbitration process due to the existence of pending arbitration proceedings. The petitioner&#039;s claim for non-payment of services rendered was deemed premature as the respondent had initiated arbitration proceedings, which were progressing with the appointment of a sole arbitrator. The Tribunal highlighted the need to respect the arbitration clause in the agreement and advised the petitioner to address any non-compliance by the respondent with the arbitral award through subsequent proceedings if required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>