<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 537 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287938</link>
    <description>The court held that a power-of-attorney holder can only appear as a witness in their personal capacity, not on behalf of the party. If the plaintiff is unable to appear, provisions for recording evidence or accommodating disabilities should be utilized. The court dismissed the revision, finding no error in the trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 18:31:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 537 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287938</link>
      <description>The court held that a power-of-attorney holder can only appear as a witness in their personal capacity, not on behalf of the party. If the plaintiff is unable to appear, provisions for recording evidence or accommodating disabilities should be utilized. The court dismissed the revision, finding no error in the trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>