<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 249 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287936</link>
    <description>Section 80J relief, once validly granted in the initial assessment year, is treated as continuing for the prescribed period and cannot be denied in a later year without disturbing the original grant. Donation deduction under section 80G is assessed on substance rather than form, so a contribution made in kind, such as cement bags supplied to a charitable institution, may still qualify where it is the practical equivalent of a cash donation. For expenditure on a guest house occupied by a managing director, the specific disallowance provision was held to prevail over a general disallowance rule, and section 40(a)(v) was treated as inapplicable to the item in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2020 16:29:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 249 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287936</link>
      <description>Section 80J relief, once validly granted in the initial assessment year, is treated as continuing for the prescribed period and cannot be denied in a later year without disturbing the original grant. Donation deduction under section 80G is assessed on substance rather than form, so a contribution made in kind, such as cement bags supplied to a charitable institution, may still qualify where it is the practical equivalent of a cash donation. For expenditure on a guest house occupied by a managing director, the specific disallowance provision was held to prevail over a general disallowance rule, and section 40(a)(v) was treated as inapplicable to the item in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>