https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287935 The court admitted the petitioner's company winding-up petition against the respondent company due to dishonor of cheques, lack of dispute on liability, and expiration of the repayment extension period. The court directed the petitioner to deposit an amount for advertisement of the winding-up petition and scheduled a future direction hearing for January 2013. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2020 15:17:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287935 The court admitted the petitioner's company winding-up petition against the respondent company due to dishonor of cheques, lack of dispute on liability, and expiration of the repayment extension period. The court directed the petitioner to deposit an amount for advertisement of the winding-up petition and scheduled a future direction hearing for January 2013. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287935