<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 239 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395206</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s order, thereby validating the assessee&#039;s use of the Completed Contract Method over the Percentage Completion Method for accounting. The rental income from Forum Mall was classified as &quot;Income from business,&quot; not &quot;Income from house property,&quot; and taxed under &quot;income from other sources,&quot; favoring the assessee on all substantial questions of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=612637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 239 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395206</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appeal, affirming the ITAT&#039;s order, thereby validating the assessee&#039;s use of the Completed Contract Method over the Percentage Completion Method for accounting. The rental income from Forum Mall was classified as &quot;Income from business,&quot; not &quot;Income from house property,&quot; and taxed under &quot;income from other sources,&quot; favoring the assessee on all substantial questions of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>