https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287932 Notice of a State appeal against acquittal was held sufficient where the accused had effective knowledge of the appeal and was represented before the appellate court, so the conviction was not vitiated for want of notice. Article 20(3) was found inapplicable because there was no legal compulsion to produce the currency notes and, in any event, the protection operates only when an accused is compelled to be a witness against himself. The SC also upheld the High Court's reversal of acquittal, holding that it could reappreciate the evidence, reject the trial court's perverse view, and rely on the complainant's evidence and surrounding recovery circumstances. en-us Fri, 26 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2020 11:57:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287932 Notice of a State appeal against acquittal was held sufficient where the accused had effective knowledge of the appeal and was represented before the appellate court, so the conviction was not vitiated for want of notice. Article 20(3) was found inapplicable because there was no legal compulsion to produce the currency notes and, in any event, the protection operates only when an accused is compelled to be a witness against himself. The SC also upheld the High Court's reversal of acquittal, holding that it could reappreciate the evidence, reject the trial court's perverse view, and rely on the complainant's evidence and surrounding recovery circumstances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287932