https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287931 The court held that the Indian Limitation Act applies to arbitration proceedings, and arbitrators must consider the same defences available in a court of law, including limitation defences. The arbitration proceedings initiated after a prior decision were deemed new proceedings, not a continuation. Time spent in the initial arbitration, found to be without jurisdiction, was excluded under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondents. en-us Thu, 24 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2020 11:49:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287931 The court held that the Indian Limitation Act applies to arbitration proceedings, and arbitrators must consider the same defences available in a court of law, including limitation defences. The arbitration proceedings initiated after a prior decision were deemed new proceedings, not a continuation. Time spent in the initial arbitration, found to be without jurisdiction, was excluded under Section 14 of the Indian Limitation Act. The appeal was dismissed with costs to the respondents. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Jan 1929 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287931