https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395196 The ITAT partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the challenged additions. The ITAT found that the explanations provided by the assessee were satisfactory and that there was insufficient evidence to support the additions made by the Revenue Authorities. The additions related to cash credits in the bank account, interest on FDRs, private practice income, and unexplained investments in shares and mutual funds were deleted based on the assessee's explanations and the lack of corroborative evidence. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2020 11:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395196 The ITAT partially allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the challenged additions. The ITAT found that the explanations provided by the assessee were satisfactory and that there was insufficient evidence to support the additions made by the Revenue Authorities. The additions related to cash credits in the bank account, interest on FDRs, private practice income, and unexplained investments in shares and mutual funds were deleted based on the assessee's explanations and the lack of corroborative evidence. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395196