https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287930 Time spent in abortive arbitration proceedings could not be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, because that provision applies to civil proceedings in a court of first instance or appeal, not to arbitration before an arbitrator. After the Arbitration Act, 1940, the limitation scheme was governed by Section 37, which applied the Limitation Act to arbitrations and allowed only the narrow exclusion under Section 37(5) where the statutory conditions were met. As no award was set aside and no order declared the arbitration agreement ineffective, the suit remained time-barred. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2020 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287930 Time spent in abortive arbitration proceedings could not be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, because that provision applies to civil proceedings in a court of first instance or appeal, not to arbitration before an arbitrator. After the Arbitration Act, 1940, the limitation scheme was governed by Section 37, which applied the Limitation Act to arbitrations and allowed only the narrow exclusion under Section 37(5) where the statutory conditions were met. As no award was set aside and no order declared the arbitration agreement ineffective, the suit remained time-barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287930