https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287930 The court concluded that the suit was barred by limitation. The plaintiff's arguments regarding the exclusion of time in arbitration proceedings under Section 14 of the Limitation Act were rejected. It was held that Section 14 does not apply to arbitration proceedings, as clarified by the interpretation of Section 37(1) and 37(5) of the Arbitration Act. Since no court order existed setting aside an award or declaring the arbitration agreement ineffective, the time taken in arbitration could not be excluded. The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the plaintiff. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 May 2020 11:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287930 The court concluded that the suit was barred by limitation. The plaintiff's arguments regarding the exclusion of time in arbitration proceedings under Section 14 of the Limitation Act were rejected. It was held that Section 14 does not apply to arbitration proceedings, as clarified by the interpretation of Section 37(1) and 37(5) of the Arbitration Act. Since no court order existed setting aside an award or declaring the arbitration agreement ineffective, the time taken in arbitration could not be excluded. The appeal was dismissed, and costs were awarded against the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Oct 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287930